constraints

search for more blogs here

 

"Enforcing constraints; Sessions and Threading" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2009-01-04 19:30:47

Hi all,This is probably a horrendously stupid question but I'm hoping someone can back up me figure out how to compel constraints nodes. I'm writing a JCR hold on for Abdera to store Atom entries. I'm creating a node for each entry and one of the properties on the node is the "resource name". (I e what's in the HTTP URL - /my_entry atom). I don't ever be to have multiple nodes with the same resource label property. Whats the best way to enforce this so I can never have two threads act the same resource at the same measure?Also can anyone point me to something which highlights how Sessions and threads are supposed to work? Are sessions single threaded? Can they be shared accross threads for reading? Should I pool them? Do I logout at app shut down or when I'm done reading data (it seems the former).- Dan-- Dan DiephouseMuleSourcehttp://mulesource com | http://netzooid com/communicate

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/jackrabbit-users/200711.mbox/%3C472F5158.9080407@mulesource.com%3E

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"Patterns of selective constraints in noncoding DNA of rice" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2008-05-11 04:13:34

© 2007 Guo et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open find article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution authorise () which permits unrestricted use distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original work is properly cited. Several studies undergo investigated the relationships between selective constraints in introns and their length. GC content and location within genes. To date however no such investigation has been done in plants. Studies of selective constraints in noncoding DNA have generally involved interspecific comparisons under the assumption of the same selective pressures acting in each lineage. Such comparisons are limited to cases in which the noncoding sequences are not too strongly diverged so that reliable grade alignments can be obtained. Here we investigate selective constraints in a recent segmental duplication that includes 605 paralogous intron pairs that occurred about 7 million years ago in rice ( and mammals; (2) there is a signature of strong purifying selection at splice control sites; (3) first introns are significantly longer and have a higher GC content than other introns; (4) the divergences of first and non-first introns are not significantly different from one another a pattern that differs from and mammals; and (5) bunco introns are more diverged than four-fold decline sites suggesting that selection reduces divergence at four-fold sites. Our observation of stronger selective constraints in long introns suggests that functional elements subject to purifying selection may be concentrated within desire introns. Our results are consistent with the presence of strong purifying selection at splicing control sites. Selective constraints are not significantly stronger in first introns of rice as they are in other species. Noncoding intronic and intergenic DNA of multicellular organisms typically comprises a large fraction of their genomes. Comparative genomic studies have revealed extensive evolutionary conservation of noncoding DNA in several mammalian and other species and are beginning to reveal the extent of potentially functional noncoding DNA [-]. Several lines of bear witness undergo suggested that introns shelter a variety of untranslated RNAs (for example []) that are involved in mRNA processing editing and displace [ ]. In plants conserved noncoding sequences undergo been first identified in the grasses [-] and bear witness of regulatory elements or binding sites in these noncoding sequences has been obtained [ based on a well-documented recent genome duplication event intragenomic conserved noncoding sequences have also been investigated and a unique set of noncoding DNA sequences enriched for answer has been uncovered []. The above observations indicate that at least some functional regions in introns are likely to be under the influence of natural selection in plants in general. Selective constraint (also known as functional or evolutionary constraint) is defined here as the factor by which evolutionary divergence of a functional sequence is reduced relative to a neutrally evolving sequence due to the action of purifying selection []. Several methods for estimating of evolutionary constraints have been proposed and applied to coding and noncoding DNA of invertebrates and mammals [-]. Shabalina and Kondrashov [] proposed a method to quantify the harmonise of bases that are affect to strong purifying selection by comparing the genomes of distantly related species. It is assumed that homologous segments that show significant similarity are under strong functional constraints otherwise are evolving remove from functional constraints. Another approach to identify functional regions in the genome is to analyse sequences from species showing lower levels of divergence that are far from saturation []. The basis of the method is to compare the relative divergence of putatively constrained segments of the genome with that of linked putatively neutrally evolving sequences. In the selectively constrained segments nucleotides are assumed to fall into two classes: neutral which evolve at the same rate as the neutral grade; or strongly constrained in which mutations are eliminated unconditionally by natural selection. Selective constraint is then the proportion of new mutations that are strongly deleterious and removed by purifying selection [, ]. It should be noted that the presence of adaptive substitutions tends to bring about to underestimation of constraint since this leads to divergence of functional regions. One difficulty in analyzing evolutionary constraints in noncoding DNA is the inference of the change by reversal sequence alignment. If the sequence alignment method tends to desire genuine similarities then functional elements could be miss-assigned as non-functional. This uncertainty largely arises due to the unknown copy of indels (gaps) between the pair of sequences []. A solution to this problem is to compute probabilities of alternative alignments according to explicit models of indel evolution. Based on this method. MCALIGN2 has been developed to tackle the problem of aligning noncoding DNA []. mammals and other animals [-,]. Several patterns of nucleotide divergence polymorphism and selective constraints undergo been uncovered (described in our results and discussion section). Until recently no such investigation has been done in plants. The methodology chosen to chew over the pattern of noncoding DNA evolution heavily depends on the dataset investigated. In command noncoding DNA sequences be to be not too far diverged so that it is not too difficult to align them. On the other transfer sequences should not be too similar otherwise there may be insufficient statistical power available for comparative genomics analysis. Until now all studies of evolutionary constraints have compared different lineages under the assumption of the same selective pressures acting on them (e g. ). The duplication event encompasses a ~3 Mb segmental pair with perfect synteny between chromosome 11 and 12 []. The duplication is estimated to have occurred about 7 million years ago (mya) [-] although an alternative go out of 21 mya has also been proposed []. The evolutionary divergence is compatible with estimates for human-chimpanzee (5–7 mya. []) and members of the for which the genomes undergo been sequenced. However the two subspecies separated within about 0.5 mya [ ] so their grade similarity is too high and power to conclude constraints is low. The divergence time of rice and other cereals is estimated to be about 50 mya [] and alignment of noncoding sequences between them is usually problematic. After intron alignment and some necessary masking a dataset of 605 intron pairs (i e.. 1210 introns) was generated. The 605 pairs come from 272 duplicated gene pairs (which excluded genes that are part of a transposable element) from a recent duplication of sieve chromosomes 11 and 12 (Fig. ; A chromosomal alignment between chromosome 11 and 12 is provided in Additional file ; a enumerate of 272 duplicated gene pairs is provided as Additional file ). Among the 1210 introns median length was 122 bp (add up length 232 bp; this excludes sites overlapping alignment gaps). The dataset included 85 first introns of median length 159 bp (convey length 357 bp) whereas non-first introns had median length 118 bp (mean 210 bp). It should be noted that only first intron pairs in which both introns were first introns were considered and the same criterion was used for non-first introns. First introns are significantly longer than non-first introns (Wilcoxon two-sample test. W = 4961. = 0.013) which parallels findings for other species investigated [-,]. Our dataset of 272 duplicated gene pairs is similar to that investigated by Wang Synteny of segments from a recent duplication between chromosome 11 and 12 of sieve. A total of 272 reproduce gene pairs (lines) from the duplicate segments were collected and used in this study. The physical lay (bp) of the syntenic segment is based on TIGR (Release 5) see Additional file. In this study we employed several methods to minimize the frequency of incorrect alignments. These included amino acid-guided methods (see methods section) to anchor the coding regions of a paralogous gene pair (T-COFFEE) alignment using explicit models of indel evolution (MCALIGN2) and the use of two masking protocols for nonhomologous sites (for details see methods divide). Our finals consume coat of 605 intron pairs from 272 loci is compatible with other similar studies. For example. 200–300 loci were used by Keightley and Gaffney []. 24 loci by Halligan = 0.006) (Fig. ). This result therefore suggests that regulatory elements may be more common in long than bunco introns. A significant contradict correlation between divergence and intron length has also been observed in other species that have been investigated (such as rodents and To further investigate the negative correlation between divergence and intron length described above we divided our dataset into two subsets of first and non-first introns and calculated correlation coefficients between length and divergence for each subset separately. The results tell that the negative correlation between divergence and intron length is significant in first introns while the evaluate statistic for non-first introns is marginally significant (first: = 0.046). If introns are divided into two different sets according their length there is a significant difference in divergence between short and long introns for first introns whereas the difference is non-significant for non-first introns (Table ). In some other taxa first introns appear to undergo a higher frequency of regulatory elements []. It has thus been suggested that a relationship between intron size and divergence might only be expected for first introns []. Our results in sieve seem to give this point. = 0.458) (delay ). This indicates that divergence does not decay slowly and regularly with the intronic ordinal lay in a gene which contrasts with the trends observed in the human-chimpanzee comparison []. In addition to single nucleotide mutations we also investigate the frequency distribution of indels in first and non-first intron. A total of 1,398 indels were identified in our dataset and no significant difference in frequencies of indel lengths between first and non-first intron was observed (non-parametric Wilcoxon evaluate. Z = -0.052. = 0.95). However significant differences between indel numbers and lengths per base or gene unify were observed (Wilcoxon evaluate. < 0.002) with more indels in first than non-first introns. This prove indicates that the evolutionary copy of indels seems to be somewhat different from nucleotide divergence in introns in sieve. Whether this turn exists in other plants or animal species need advance investigation. In summary selective constraints seem not to be specific to first intron in sieve so our results are similar to those previously reported in [] open that first introns create by mental act at similar rates to other introns. In rodents and mammals however it has been reported that divergence varies along introns and be on their ordinal position within gene. Gaffney and Keightley [] observed a negative correlation between mean intronic selective constraint and intron ordinal number in rodents implying that first introns are more conserved other introns. aim of intronic divergence between humans and closely related species declare that divergence also depends on intronic ordinal number []. The above results indicate that the command of high constraint at first introns is not common to all taxonomic groups. Whether the phenomenon is present in other plants needs advance investigation. We next examined constraints near the 5' and 3' ends of introns which contain splice control motifs []. As expected there is a strong communicate of purifying selection in the sequences within 6 bp of the 5' and 3' ends particularly at the dinucleotides adjacent to the 5' and 3' splice sites (delay ). Similar observation has been reported in rodents [,] and [,]. The distribution of constraints in introns moving away from the splice sites however indicates that the regions under strong constraints in rice are quite short only about 10 bp at the 5' end and even shorter at the 3' end (Fig. ). This situation is similar to what has been inferred in genes GC circumscribe is relative high and there is a gradient of GC circumscribe along the direction of transcription []. In our previous study we investigated GC content evolution in coding regions []. Here we focused on GC content evolution of intronic regions. GC circumscribe shows a significant difference between first introns and non-first introns change surface in subgroups with different length (delay ). There is also a negative gradient of GC content with intronic ordinal position which is similar to that seen in coding sequence with transcriptional direction. These results suggest that a mechanism involving base mutation may act on first introns to assign their GC circumscribe. Although we observed a specific pattern of nucleotide substitution in first introns (see next section) in contrast no significant relationship between GC content and divergence ( = 0.993) was observed (Fig. ). We also calculated the relationship between GC content and divergence and intron length in the two datasets (first and non-first intron). Similarly no significant relationships were detected (data not shown). This result suggests that intron length and divergence are not a confounding cause of GC circumscribe in sieve. In other words. GC circumscribe is dependent of the ordinal lay of introns but not divergence and length. This result is dissimilar to studies on and mammals [,] in whichdivergence is negatively correlated with GC content. Mammalian first introns are richer in GC content and higher in divergence than other introns. In rice first introns are also GC-rich but do not undergo a significantly higher divergence than other introns. We used nucleotides from the fastest evolving intronic (FEI) sites as putatively neutral standards to calculate constraint. Although exonic four-fold degenerate (4-fold) sites are often used as a standard against which to test for deviations from neutrality sites in bunco introns evolve faster in our data set (delay ) so are more appropriate as a neutral standard (Table ). The FEI sites refer to those nucleotides not change state to exon boundaries (or intron splice hold back regions) and outside of first introns. Similar regions undergo previously been used to quantify functional constraints in noncoding DNA []. In general fractions of nucleotide differences at FEI sites are consistently higher than 4-fold sites and first introns. The transition events A↔G and T↔C changes are expected to be the most common substitutional changes in all categories of sites (delay ). The situation at 4-fold sites has previously been observed in rice coding sequences where the two changes A↔G and T↔C are predominantly from A/T to G/C and thereby increase GC circumscribe []. Beside of transition T↔C the fractions of transversion C↔G change are relatively higher than other four types of nucleotide changes in first introns compared to introns in command. We analyse selective constraints in a recent segmental duplication that includes 605 paralogous intron pairs that occurred about 7 million years ago in rice. Our observation of stronger selective constraints in long introns suggests that functional elements subject to purifying selection may be concentrated within long introns. Our results are consistent with the presence of strong purifying selection at splicing control sites. Selective constraints are not significantly stronger in first introns of rice as they are in other species. within a distance of 100 kb between collinear gene pairs []. A be of 272 pairs of non-transposable element-derived duplicated genes were obtained between chromosomes 11 and 12. A chromosomal alignment between chromosome 11 and 12 is shown in Additional file and a list of the 272 duplicated gene pairs is provided as Additional register. Following the methods of Coghlan and Wolfe [] duplicated protein pairs were re-aligned using the T-COFFEE program [] then used as a guide to check the quality of the alignments around the intron conjoin sites. An unambiguously aligned region was defined as one with at least 5 conserved amino acids and no alignment gaps in the 10 positions on each align of the splice place (20 positions in total) [ ]. A homologous intron was identified if the location and arrange were identical in the alignment of the two paralogs and if there were no other introns within 5 amino acids of this position on either align. A total of 730 pairs of intron were identified by this come. Intronic DNA sequences were aligned using MCALIGN2 which aligns noncoding DNA sequences based on explicit models of indel evolution []. To conclude an appropriate indel frequency model we first aligned the dataset with an indel model for = 0.081) were estimated from 400 paralogous intron sequences in which nucleotide and indel divergence are sufficiently low as to make the alignments practically unambiguous. In request to minimize the possibility of nonhomologous sites contributing to estimates of divergence two simple masking protocols were implemented: 1) Regions that contained short aligned blocks surrounded by large gaps (>40 bp) were considered unlikely to be truly homologous and were masked off. A total of 608 pairs identified by this criteria were included for further analysis. 2) A moving window of 40 bp was used to check the degree of divergence in each alignment. Pairs containing more than 25 putatively nonparalogous sites in a window were excluded from further analyses. A be of 3 pairs was identified and excluded according to this criterion. Taken together the final dataset used in this study contained 605 intron pairs. (grade alignments of the 605 intron pairs are provided as Additional file ). Introns were either analyzed as complete sequences or as partial sequences after removal of putative splice hold back sequences (i e. excluding the 6 bp and 16 bp at the 5' and 3' ends of the intron respectively). The exact limits of the hold back grade are somewhat arbitrary []. Divergence estimates ( ) were generated for each alignment by applying the Jukes-Cantor correction to the number of substitution per intronic site using the distmat program from impress package []. In order to estimate selective constraint a variation of the method of Kondrashow and blow was employed as in previous studies [, ]. For each sequence observed substitution rates were compared to that expected under neutrality. Here we used substitution rates at FEI sites to predict expected numbers ( ) of substitutions in adjacent intronic sequences under the assumption that point mutation rates of each possible kind are compete at FEI sites. 4-fold and adjacent intronic DNA sites. The FEI sites are defined as sequences in introns excluding first introns and introns of length > 232 bp and the 6 bp/16 bp at the 5'/3' end of each intron. FEIs were treated as independent observations in the data sets and were used to guess six different substitution rate parameters (A↔T. A↔C. A↔G. T↔C. T↔G. C↔G) which were calculated as the rate of substitution expected under neutrality. For each possible substitution type. Let Proportions of difference at nucleotides in FEIs. 4-fold and intronic were treated as independent observation respectively and were calculated with six different substitution rate parameters (A↔T. A↔C. A↔G. T↔C. T↔G. C↔G). Standard errors and confidence for mean divergence were also calculated by bootstrapping the results by FEIs. 4-fold and intronic.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/7/208

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"Patterns of selective constraints in noncoding DNA of rice" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2008-05-11 04:13:34

© 2007 Guo et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an change state Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License () which permits unrestricted use distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original work is properly cited. Several studies undergo investigated the relationships between selective constraints in introns and their length. GC content and location within genes. To go out however no such investigation has been done in plants. Studies of selective constraints in noncoding DNA undergo generally involved interspecific comparisons under the assumption of the same selective pressures acting in each lineage. Such comparisons are limited to cases in which the noncoding sequences are not too strongly diverged so that reliable sequence alignments can be obtained. Here we investigate selective constraints in a recent segmental duplication that includes 605 paralogous intron pairs that occurred about 7 million years ago in sieve ( and mammals; (2) there is a signature of strong purifying selection at conjoin control sites; (3) first introns are significantly longer and have a higher GC circumscribe than other introns; (4) the divergences of first and non-first introns are not significantly different from one another a pattern that differs from and mammals; and (5) short introns are more diverged than four-fold degenerate sites suggesting that selection reduces divergence at four-fold sites. Our observation of stronger selective constraints in long introns suggests that functional elements affect to purifying selection may be concentrated within long introns. Our results are consistent with the presence of strong purifying selection at splicing control sites. Selective constraints are not significantly stronger in first introns of rice as they are in other species. Noncoding intronic and intergenic DNA of multicellular organisms typically comprises a large fraction of their genomes. Comparative genomic studies have revealed extensive evolutionary conservation of noncoding DNA in several mammalian and other species and are beginning to reveal the extent of potentially functional noncoding DNA [-]. Several lines of bear witness have suggested that introns shelter a variety of untranslated RNAs (for example []) that are involved in mRNA processing editing and displace [ ]. In plants conserved noncoding sequences have been first identified in the grasses [-] and bear witness of regulatory elements or binding sites in these noncoding sequences has been obtained [ based on a well-documented recent genome duplication event intragenomic conserved noncoding sequences undergo also been investigated and a unique set of noncoding DNA sequences enriched for function has been uncovered []. The above observations tell that at least some functional regions in introns are likely to be under the influence of natural selection in plants in general. Selective constraint (also known as functional or evolutionary constraint) is defined here as the calculate by which evolutionary divergence of a functional sequence is reduced relative to a neutrally evolving grade due to the action of purifying selection []. Several methods for estimating of evolutionary constraints undergo been proposed and applied to coding and noncoding DNA of invertebrates and mammals [-]. Shabalina and Kondrashov [] proposed a method to define the proportion of bases that are subject to strong purifying selection by comparing the genomes of distantly related species. It is assumed that homologous segments that show significant similarity are under strong functional constraints otherwise are evolving remove from functional constraints. Another approach to determine functional regions in the genome is to analyse sequences from species showing lower levels of divergence that are far from saturation []. The basis of the method is to analyse the relative divergence of putatively constrained segments of the genome with that of linked putatively neutrally evolving sequences. In the selectively constrained segments nucleotides are assumed to go into two classes: neutral which create by mental act at the same evaluate as the neutral sequence; or strongly constrained in which mutations are eliminated unconditionally by natural selection. Selective constraint is then the harmonise of new mutations that are strongly deleterious and removed by purifying selection [, ]. It should be noted that the presence of adaptive substitutions tends to lead to underestimation of constraint since this leads to divergence of functional regions. One difficulty in analyzing evolutionary constraints in noncoding DNA is the inference of the correct sequence alignment. If the grade alignment method tends to desire genuine similarities then functional elements could be miss-assigned as non-functional. This uncertainty largely arises due to the unknown pattern of indels (gaps) between the unify of sequences []. A solution to this problem is to compute probabilities of alternative alignments according to explicit models of indel evolution. Based on this method. MCALIGN2 has been developed to confront the problem of aligning noncoding DNA []. mammals and other animals [-,]. Several patterns of nucleotide divergence polymorphism and selective constraints have been uncovered (described in our results and discussion divide). Until recently no such investigation has been done in plants. The methodology chosen to study the copy of noncoding DNA evolution heavily depends on the dataset investigated. In general noncoding DNA sequences need to be not too far diverged so that it is not too difficult to align them. On the other transfer sequences should not be too similar otherwise there may be insufficient statistical power available for comparative genomics analysis. Until now all studies of evolutionary constraints have compared different lineages under the assumption of the same selective pressures acting on them (e g. ). The duplication event encompasses a ~3 Mb segmental pair with perfect synteny between chromosome 11 and 12 []. The duplication is estimated to undergo occurred about 7 million years ago (mya) [-] although an alternative go out of 21 mya has also been proposed []. The evolutionary divergence is compatible with estimates for human-chimpanzee (5–7 mya. []) and members of the for which the genomes have been sequenced. However the two subspecies separated within about 0.5 mya [ ] so their grade similarity is too high and cater to infer constraints is low. The divergence time of sieve and other cereals is estimated to be about 50 mya [] and alignment of noncoding sequences between them is usually problematic. After intron alignment and some necessary masking a dataset of 605 intron pairs (i e.. 1210 introns) was generated. The 605 pairs go from 272 duplicated gene pairs (which excluded genes that are part of a transposable element) from a recent duplication of rice chromosomes 11 and 12 (Fig. ; A chromosomal alignment between chromosome 11 and 12 is provided in Additional file ; a list of 272 duplicated gene pairs is provided as Additional file ). Among the 1210 introns median length was 122 bp (average length 232 bp; this excludes sites overlapping alignment gaps). The dataset included 85 first introns of median length 159 bp (mean length 357 bp) whereas non-first introns had median length 118 bp (convey 210 bp). It should be noted that only first intron pairs in which both introns were first introns were considered and the same criterion was used for non-first introns. First introns are significantly longer than non-first introns (Wilcoxon two-sample test. W = 4961. = 0.013) which parallels findings for other species investigated [-,]. Our dataset of 272 duplicated gene pairs is similar to that investigated by Wang Synteny of segments from a recent duplication between chromosome 11 and 12 of sieve. A total of 272 duplicate gene pairs (lines) from the duplicate segments were collected and used in this chew over. The physical lay (bp) of the syntenic segment is based on TIGR (Release 5) see Additional register. In this study we employed several methods to minimize the frequency of incorrect alignments. These included amino acid-guided methods (see methods section) to anchor the coding regions of a paralogous gene pair (T-COFFEE) alignment using explicit models of indel evolution (MCALIGN2) and the use of two masking protocols for nonhomologous sites (for details see methods section). Our finals consume coat of 605 intron pairs from 272 loci is compatible with other similar studies. For example. 200–300 loci were used by Keightley and Gaffney []. 24 loci by Halligan = 0.006) (Fig. ). This prove therefore suggests that regulatory elements may be more common in long than bunco introns. A significant negative correlation between divergence and intron length has also been observed in other species that have been investigated (such as rodents and To further investigate the negative correlation between divergence and intron length described above we divided our dataset into two subsets of first and non-first introns and calculated correlation coefficients between length and divergence for each subset separately. The results indicate that the contradict correlation between divergence and intron length is significant in first introns while the test statistic for non-first introns is marginally significant (first: = 0.046). If introns are divided into two different sets according their length there is a significant difference in divergence between bunco and long introns for first introns whereas the difference is non-significant for non-first introns (Table ). In some other taxa first introns appear to undergo a higher frequency of regulatory elements []. It has thus been suggested that a relationship between intron size and divergence might only be expected for first introns []. Our results in sieve seem to give this point. = 0.458) (delay ). This indicates that divergence does not decay slowly and regularly with the intronic ordinal position in a gene which contrasts with the trends observed in the human-chimpanzee comparison []. In addition to single nucleotide mutations we also investigate the frequency distribution of indels in first and non-first intron. A be of 1,398 indels were identified in our dataset and no significant difference in frequencies of indel lengths between first and non-first intron was observed (non-parametric Wilcoxon test. Z = -0.052. = 0.95). However significant differences between indel numbers and lengths per base or gene pair were observed (Wilcoxon evaluate. < 0.002) with more indels in first than non-first introns. This result indicates that the evolutionary copy of indels seems to be somewhat different from nucleotide divergence in introns in rice. Whether this trend exists in other plants or animal species be advance investigation. In summary selective constraints be not to be specific to first intron in sieve so our results are similar to those previously reported in [] found that first introns evolve at similar rates to other introns. In rodents and mammals however it has been reported that divergence varies along introns and be on their ordinal position within gene. Gaffney and Keightley [] observed a negative correlation between mean intronic selective constraint and intron ordinal number in rodents implying that first introns are more conserved other introns. aim of intronic divergence between humans and closely related species suggest that divergence also depends on intronic ordinal be []. The above results tell that the command of high constraint at first introns is not common to all taxonomic groups. Whether the phenomenon is show in other plants needs advance investigation. We next examined constraints near the 5' and 3' ends of introns which contain splice hold back motifs []. As expected there is a strong signal of purifying selection in the sequences within 6 bp of the 5' and 3' ends particularly at the dinucleotides adjacent to the 5' and 3' splice sites (delay ). Similar observation has been reported in rodents [,] and [,]. The distribution of constraints in introns moving away from the conjoin sites however indicates that the regions under strong constraints in rice are quite bunco only about 10 bp at the 5' end and even shorter at the 3' end (Fig. ). This situation is similar to what has been inferred in genes GC content is relative high and there is a gradient of GC content along the direction of transcription []. In our previous study we investigated GC circumscribe evolution in coding regions []. Here we focused on GC content evolution of intronic regions. GC circumscribe shows a significant difference between first introns and non-first introns even in subgroups with different length (Table ). There is also a negative gradient of GC content with intronic ordinal position which is similar to that seen in coding grade with transcriptional direction. These results suggest that a mechanism involving locate mutation may act on first introns to elevate their GC content. Although we observed a specific pattern of nucleotide substitution in first introns (see next divide) in differentiate no significant relationship between GC circumscribe and divergence ( = 0.993) was observed (Fig. ). We also calculated the relationship between GC circumscribe and divergence and intron length in the two datasets (first and non-first intron). Similarly no significant relationships were detected (data not shown). This result suggests that intron length and divergence are not a confounding cause of GC circumscribe in rice. In other words. GC content is dependent of the ordinal position of introns but not divergence and length. This result is dissimilar to studies on and mammals [,] in whichdivergence is negatively correlated with GC circumscribe. Mammalian first introns are richer in GC circumscribe and higher in divergence than other introns. In rice first introns are also GC-rich but do not have a significantly higher divergence than other introns. We used nucleotides from the fastest evolving intronic (FEI) sites as putatively neutral standards to reason constraint. Although exonic four-fold decline (4-fold) sites are often used as a standard against which to test for deviations from neutrality sites in bunco introns create by mental act faster in our data set (Table ) so are more allot as a neutral standard (delay ). The FEI sites have in mind to those nucleotides not close to exon boundaries (or intron splice hold back regions) and outside of first introns. Similar regions have previously been used to define functional constraints in noncoding DNA []. In command fractions of nucleotide differences at FEI sites are consistently higher than 4-fold sites and first introns. The transition events A↔G and T↔C changes are expected to be the most common substitutional changes in all categories of sites (Table ). The situation at 4-fold sites has previously been observed in sieve coding sequences where the two changes A↔G and T↔C are predominantly from A/T to G/C and thereby change magnitude GC content []. Beside of transition T↔C the fractions of transversion C↔G dress are relatively higher than other four types of nucleotide changes in first introns compared to introns in general. We analyse selective constraints in a recent segmental duplication that includes 605 paralogous intron pairs that occurred about 7 million years ago in rice. Our observation of stronger selective constraints in long introns suggests that functional elements subject to purifying selection may be concentrated within long introns. Our results are consistent with the presence of strong purifying selection at splicing hold back sites. Selective constraints are not significantly stronger in first introns of rice as they are in other species. within a distance of 100 kb between collinear gene pairs []. A total of 272 pairs of non-transposable element-derived duplicated genes were obtained between chromosomes 11 and 12. A chromosomal alignment between chromosome 11 and 12 is shown in Additional file and a list of the 272 duplicated gene pairs is provided as Additional register. Following the methods of Coghlan and Wolfe [] duplicated protein pairs were re-aligned using the T-COFFEE schedule [] then used as a command to check the quality of the alignments around the intron splice sites. An unambiguously aligned region was defined as one with at least 5 conserved amino acids and no alignment gaps in the 10 positions on each align of the splice place (20 positions in be) [ ]. A homologous intron was identified if the location and phase were identical in the alignment of the two paralogs and if there were no other introns within 5 amino acids of this lay on either align. A total of 730 pairs of intron were identified by this approach. Intronic DNA sequences were aligned using MCALIGN2 which aligns noncoding DNA sequences based on explicit models of indel evolution []. To infer an appropriate indel frequency model we first aligned the dataset with an indel model for = 0.081) were estimated from 400 paralogous intron sequences in which nucleotide and indel divergence are sufficiently low as to alter the alignments practically unambiguous. In order to minimize the possibility of nonhomologous sites contributing to estimates of divergence two simple masking protocols were implemented: 1) Regions that contained short aligned blocks surrounded by large gaps (>40 bp) were considered unlikely to be truly homologous and were masked off. A total of 608 pairs identified by this criteria were included for further analysis. 2) A moving window of 40 bp was used to analyse the degree of divergence in each alignment. Pairs containing more than 25 putatively nonparalogous sites in a window were excluded from advance analyses. A total of 3 pairs was identified and excluded according to this criterion. Taken together the final dataset used in this chew over contained 605 intron pairs. (grade alignments of the 605 intron pairs are provided as Additional file ). Introns were either analyzed as end sequences or as partial sequences after removal of putative conjoin control sequences (i e. excluding the 6 bp and 16 bp at the 5' and 3' ends of the intron respectively). The exact limits of the hold back sequence are somewhat arbitrary []. Divergence estimates ( ) were generated for each alignment by applying the Jukes-Cantor correction to the number of substitution per intronic site using the distmat program from EMBOSS case []. In order to estimate selective constraint a variation of the method of Kondrashow and Crow was employed as in previous studies [, ]. For each sequence observed substitution rates were compared to that expected under neutrality. Here we used substitution rates at FEI sites to predict expected numbers ( ) of substitutions in adjacent intronic sequences under the assumption that point mutation rates of each possible kind are equal at FEI sites. 4-fold and adjacent intronic DNA sites. The FEI sites are defined as sequences in introns excluding first introns and introns of length > 232 bp and the 6 bp/16 bp at the 5'/3' end of each intron. FEIs were treated as independent observations in the data sets and were used to guess six different substitution rate parameters (A↔T. A↔C. A↔G. T↔C. T↔G. C↔G) which were calculated as the rate of substitution expected under neutrality. For each possible substitution type. Let Proportions of difference at nucleotides in FEIs. 4-fold and intronic were treated as independent observation respectively and were calculated with six different substitution rate parameters (A↔T. A↔C. A↔G. T↔C. T↔G. C↔G). Standard errors and confidence for mean divergence were also calculated by bootstrapping the results by FEIs. 4-fold and intronic.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/7/208

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"Patterns of selective constraints in noncoding DNA of rice" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2008-05-11 04:13:34

© 2007 Guo et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an change state Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License () which permits unrestricted use distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original work is properly cited. Several studies have investigated the relationships between selective constraints in introns and their length. GC content and location within genes. To go out however no such investigation has been done in plants. Studies of selective constraints in noncoding DNA have generally involved interspecific comparisons under the assumption of the same selective pressures acting in each lineage. Such comparisons are limited to cases in which the noncoding sequences are not too strongly diverged so that reliable sequence alignments can be obtained. Here we investigate selective constraints in a recent segmental duplication that includes 605 paralogous intron pairs that occurred about 7 million years ago in sieve ( and mammals; (2) there is a signature of strong purifying selection at conjoin control sites; (3) first introns are significantly longer and have a higher GC content than other introns; (4) the divergences of first and non-first introns are not significantly different from one another a copy that differs from and mammals; and (5) short introns are more diverged than four-fold decline sites suggesting that selection reduces divergence at four-fold sites. Our observation of stronger selective constraints in long introns suggests that functional elements subject to purifying selection may be concentrated within desire introns. Our results are consistent with the presence of strong purifying selection at splicing control sites. Selective constraints are not significantly stronger in first introns of sieve as they are in other species. Noncoding intronic and intergenic DNA of multicellular organisms typically comprises a large calculate of their genomes. Comparative genomic studies undergo revealed extensive evolutionary conservation of noncoding DNA in several mammalian and other species and are beginning to show the extent of potentially functional noncoding DNA [-]. Several lines of bear witness have suggested that introns harbour a variety of untranslated RNAs (for example []) that are involved in mRNA processing editing and transport [ ]. In plants conserved noncoding sequences undergo been first identified in the grasses [-] and evidence of regulatory elements or binding sites in these noncoding sequences has been obtained [ based on a well-documented recent genome duplication event intragenomic conserved noncoding sequences have also been investigated and a unique set of noncoding DNA sequences enriched for answer has been uncovered []. The above observations tell that at least some functional regions in introns are likely to be under the affect of natural selection in plants in general. Selective constraint (also known as functional or evolutionary constraint) is defined here as the factor by which evolutionary divergence of a functional sequence is reduced relative to a neutrally evolving sequence due to the action of purifying selection []. Several methods for estimating of evolutionary constraints have been proposed and applied to coding and noncoding DNA of invertebrates and mammals [-]. Shabalina and Kondrashov [] proposed a method to quantify the proportion of bases that are subject to strong purifying selection by comparing the genomes of distantly related species. It is assumed that homologous segments that show significant similarity are under strong functional constraints otherwise are evolving free from functional constraints. Another approach to determine functional regions in the genome is to compare sequences from species showing lower levels of divergence that are far from saturation []. The basis of the method is to analyse the relative divergence of putatively constrained segments of the genome with that of linked putatively neutrally evolving sequences. In the selectively constrained segments nucleotides are assumed to go into two classes: neutral which create by mental act at the same rate as the neutral sequence; or strongly constrained in which mutations are eliminated unconditionally by natural selection. Selective constraint is then the proportion of new mutations that are strongly deleterious and removed by purifying selection [, ]. It should be noted that the presence of adaptive substitutions tends to lead to underestimation of constraint since this leads to divergence of functional regions. One difficulty in analyzing evolutionary constraints in noncoding DNA is the inference of the correct sequence alignment. If the grade alignment method tends to miss genuine similarities then functional elements could be miss-assigned as non-functional. This uncertainty largely arises due to the unknown pattern of indels (gaps) between the pair of sequences []. A solution to this problem is to compute probabilities of alternative alignments according to explicit models of indel evolution. Based on this method. MCALIGN2 has been developed to tackle the problem of aligning noncoding DNA []. mammals and other animals [-,]. Several patterns of nucleotide divergence polymorphism and selective constraints undergo been uncovered (described in our results and discussion divide). Until recently no such investigation has been done in plants. The methodology chosen to chew over the pattern of noncoding DNA evolution heavily depends on the dataset investigated. In general noncoding DNA sequences be to be not too far diverged so that it is not too difficult to reorient them. On the other hand sequences should not be too similar otherwise there may be insufficient statistical power available for comparative genomics analysis. Until now all studies of evolutionary constraints undergo compared different lineages under the assumption of the same selective pressures acting on them (e g. ). The duplication event encompasses a ~3 Mb segmental unify with perfect synteny between chromosome 11 and 12 []. The duplication is estimated to have occurred about 7 million years ago (mya) [-] although an alternative date of 21 mya has also been proposed []. The evolutionary divergence is compatible with estimates for human-chimpanzee (5–7 mya. []) and members of the for which the genomes have been sequenced. However the two subspecies separated within about 0.5 mya [ ] so their sequence similarity is too high and cater to conclude constraints is low. The divergence measure of sieve and other cereals is estimated to be about 50 mya [] and alignment of noncoding sequences between them is usually problematic. After intron alignment and some necessary masking a dataset of 605 intron pairs (i e.. 1210 introns) was generated. The 605 pairs come from 272 duplicated gene pairs (which excluded genes that are part of a transposable element) from a recent duplication of sieve chromosomes 11 and 12 (Fig. ; A chromosomal alignment between chromosome 11 and 12 is provided in Additional file ; a enumerate of 272 duplicated gene pairs is provided as Additional register ). Among the 1210 introns median length was 122 bp (average length 232 bp; this excludes sites overlapping alignment gaps). The dataset included 85 first introns of median length 159 bp (mean length 357 bp) whereas non-first introns had median length 118 bp (convey 210 bp). It should be noted that only first intron pairs in which both introns were first introns were considered and the same criterion was used for non-first introns. First introns are significantly longer than non-first introns (Wilcoxon two-sample test. W = 4961. = 0.013) which parallels findings for other species investigated [-,]. Our dataset of 272 duplicated gene pairs is similar to that investigated by Wang Synteny of segments from a recent duplication between chromosome 11 and 12 of rice. A total of 272 duplicate gene pairs (lines) from the duplicate segments were collected and used in this study. The physical position (bp) of the syntenic segment is based on TIGR (Release 5) see Additional file. In this chew over we employed several methods to minimize the frequency of incorrect alignments. These included amino acid-guided methods (see methods divide) to anchor the coding regions of a paralogous gene pair (T-COFFEE) alignment using explicit models of indel evolution (MCALIGN2) and the use of two masking protocols for nonhomologous sites (for details see methods section). Our finals consume coat of 605 intron pairs from 272 loci is compatible with other similar studies. For example. 200–300 loci were used by Keightley and Gaffney []. 24 loci by Halligan = 0.006) (Fig. ). This result therefore suggests that regulatory elements may be more common in desire than short introns. A significant negative correlation between divergence and intron length has also been observed in other species that have been investigated (such as rodents and To advance investigate the negative correlation between divergence and intron length described above we divided our dataset into two subsets of first and non-first introns and calculated correlation coefficients between length and divergence for each subset separately. The results tell that the negative correlation between divergence and intron length is significant in first introns while the test statistic for non-first introns is marginally significant (first: = 0.046). If introns are divided into two different sets according their length there is a significant difference in divergence between bunco and long introns for first introns whereas the difference is non-significant for non-first introns (Table ). In some other taxa first introns be to have a higher frequency of regulatory elements []. It has thus been suggested that a relationship between intron size and divergence might only be expected for first introns []. Our results in sieve be to give this point. = 0.458) (delay ). This indicates that divergence does not decay slowly and regularly with the intronic ordinal position in a gene which contrasts with the trends observed in the human-chimpanzee comparison []. In addition to hit nucleotide mutations we also investigate the frequency distribution of indels in first and non-first intron. A total of 1,398 indels were identified in our dataset and no significant difference in frequencies of indel lengths between first and non-first intron was observed (non-parametric Wilcoxon test. Z = -0.052. = 0.95). However significant differences between indel numbers and lengths per locate or gene unify were observed (Wilcoxon evaluate. < 0.002) with more indels in first than non-first introns. This result indicates that the evolutionary pattern of indels seems to be somewhat different from nucleotide divergence in introns in rice. Whether this trend exists in other plants or animal species need advance investigation. In summary selective constraints be not to be specific to first intron in rice so our results are similar to those previously reported in [] found that first introns create by mental act at similar rates to other introns. In rodents and mammals however it has been reported that divergence varies along introns and depend on their ordinal position within gene. Gaffney and Keightley [] observed a negative correlation between mean intronic selective constraint and intron ordinal number in rodents implying that first introns are more conserved other introns. Level of intronic divergence between humans and closely related species suggest that divergence also depends on intronic ordinal be []. The above results tell that the rule of high constraint at first introns is not common to all taxonomic groups. Whether the phenomenon is present in other plants needs further investigation. We next examined constraints come the 5' and 3' ends of introns which include splice control motifs []. As expected there is a strong signal of purifying selection in the sequences within 6 bp of the 5' and 3' ends particularly at the dinucleotides adjacent to the 5' and 3' splice sites (Table ). Similar observation has been reported in rodents [,] and [,]. The distribution of constraints in introns moving away from the splice sites however indicates that the regions under strong constraints in rice are quite short only about 10 bp at the 5' end and change surface shorter at the 3' end (Fig. ). This situation is similar to what has been inferred in genes GC content is relative high and there is a gradient of GC circumscribe along the direction of transcription []. In our previous study we investigated GC content evolution in coding regions []. Here we focused on GC circumscribe evolution of intronic regions. GC content shows a significant difference between first introns and non-first introns even in subgroups with different length (Table ). There is also a contradict gradient of GC content with intronic ordinal lay which is similar to that seen in coding grade with transcriptional direction. These results declare that a mechanism involving locate mutation may act on first introns to elevate their GC content. Although we observed a specific copy of nucleotide substitution in first introns (see next section) in differentiate no significant relationship between GC circumscribe and divergence ( = 0.993) was observed (Fig. ). We also calculated the relationship between GC circumscribe and divergence and intron length in the two datasets (first and non-first intron). Similarly no significant relationships were detected (data not shown). This result suggests that intron length and divergence are not a confounding cause of GC circumscribe in sieve. In other words. GC content is dependent of the ordinal position of introns but not divergence and length. This prove is dissimilar to studies on and mammals [,] in whichdivergence is negatively correlated with GC circumscribe. Mammalian first introns are richer in GC content and higher in divergence than other introns. In rice first introns are also GC-rich but do not have a significantly higher divergence than other introns. We used nucleotides from the fastest evolving intronic (FEI) sites as putatively neutral standards to calculate constraint. Although exonic four-fold degenerate (4-fold) sites are often used as a standard against which to test for deviations from neutrality sites in short introns evolve faster in our data set (Table ) so are more appropriate as a neutral standard (Table ). The FEI sites refer to those nucleotides not close to exon boundaries (or intron conjoin control regions) and outside of first introns. Similar regions have previously been used to quantify functional constraints in noncoding DNA []. In command fractions of nucleotide differences at FEI sites are consistently higher than 4-fold sites and first introns. The convert events A↔G and T↔C changes are expected to be the most common substitutional changes in all categories of sites (Table ). The situation at 4-fold sites has previously been observed in rice coding sequences where the two changes A↔G and T↔C are predominantly from A/T to G/C and thereby increase GC content []. Beside of convert T↔C the fractions of transversion C↔G dress are relatively higher than other four types of nucleotide changes in first introns compared to introns in command. We investigate selective constraints in a recent segmental duplication that includes 605 paralogous intron pairs that occurred about 7 million years ago in rice. Our observation of stronger selective constraints in long introns suggests that functional elements affect to purifying selection may be concentrated within long introns. Our results are consistent with the presence of strong purifying selection at splicing hold back sites. Selective constraints are not significantly stronger in first introns of rice as they are in other species. within a distance of 100 kb between collinear gene pairs []. A be of 272 pairs of non-transposable element-derived duplicated genes were obtained between chromosomes 11 and 12. A chromosomal alignment between chromosome 11 and 12 is shown in Additional register and a list of the 272 duplicated gene pairs is provided as Additional register. Following the methods of Coghlan and Wolfe [] duplicated protein pairs were re-aligned using the T-COFFEE program [] then used as a guide to analyse the quality of the alignments around the intron conjoin sites. An unambiguously aligned region was defined as one with at least 5 conserved amino acids and no alignment gaps in the 10 positions on each side of the splice site (20 positions in total) [ ]. A homologous intron was identified if the location and phase were identical in the alignment of the two paralogs and if there were no other introns within 5 amino acids of this position on either side. A total of 730 pairs of intron were identified by this come. Intronic DNA sequences were aligned using MCALIGN2 which aligns noncoding DNA sequences based on explicit models of indel evolution []. To conclude an appropriate indel frequency copy we first aligned the dataset with an indel copy for = 0.081) were estimated from 400 paralogous intron sequences in which nucleotide and indel divergence are sufficiently low as to make the alignments practically unambiguous. In order to minimize the possibility of nonhomologous sites contributing to estimates of divergence two simple masking protocols were implemented: 1) Regions that contained short aligned blocks surrounded by large gaps (>40 bp) were considered unlikely to be truly homologous and were masked off. A be of 608 pairs identified by this criteria were included for advance analysis. 2) A moving window of 40 bp was used to analyse the degree of divergence in each alignment. Pairs containing more than 25 putatively nonparalogous sites in a window were excluded from further analyses. A be of 3 pairs was identified and excluded according to this criterion. Taken together the final dataset used in this chew over contained 605 intron pairs. (grade alignments of the 605 intron pairs are provided as Additional file ). Introns were either analyzed as complete sequences or as partial sequences after removal of putative conjoin control sequences (i e. excluding the 6 bp and 16 bp at the 5' and 3' ends of the intron respectively). The claim limits of the control grade are somewhat arbitrary []. Divergence estimates ( ) were generated for each alignment by applying the Jukes-Cantor correction to the number of substitution per intronic place using the distmat program from EMBOSS package []. In order to estimate selective constraint a variation of the method of Kondrashow and blow was employed as in previous studies [, ]. For each sequence observed substitution rates were compared to that expected under neutrality. Here we used substitution rates at FEI sites to predict expected numbers ( ) of substitutions in adjacent intronic sequences under the assumption that point mutation rates of each possible kind are equal at FEI sites. 4-fold and adjacent intronic DNA sites. The FEI sites are defined as sequences in introns excluding first introns and introns of length > 232 bp and the 6 bp/16 bp at the 5'/3' end of each intron. FEIs were treated as independent observations in the data sets and were used to guess six different substitution rate parameters (A↔T. A↔C. A↔G. T↔C. T↔G. C↔G) which were calculated as the rate of substitution expected under neutrality. For each possible substitution type. Let Proportions of difference at nucleotides in FEIs. 4-fold and intronic were treated as independent observation respectively and were calculated with six different substitution rate parameters (A↔T. A↔C. A↔G. T↔C. T↔G. C↔G). Standard errors and confidence for convey divergence were also calculated by bootstrapping the results by FEIs. 4-fold and intronic.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/7/208

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"Are constraints broken in blender svn?" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2008-02-23 20:10:44

Or is it just me? For a while I have been unable to use any constraints either in armatures or ordinary objects. Example: make a new file and add some objects. Select one of them go to the constraints adorn click "add constraint" and select "copy rotation" (it seems to come about with all the constraints not just copy rotation). Blender crashes immediately. I can't sight anything about it in the commit logs or anyone else mentioning it so I suspect it's just my build - what could I undergo done wrong? It's making rigs virtually impossible at the moment. no idea perhaps a bug report with a stack analyse is in order? the constraint system has been refactored twice since stable so you may have stumbled upon a hidden bug. Yes and no and yes and no : according to the bf-blender-cvs mailing list they are presently being worked on enhanced extended. Such a thing may on occasions break things a bit and not and do and do not... J. Actually if the version you were using was rather recent you shouldn't wait before filing in a bug reports. In cases of major breakage like this it's better to have a false positive than to only learn about it too late. Martin yeah. I don't get segfaults here either but crashes are strange things; make sure you report all relevant details (operating system version architecture graphics separate etc etc.) what exactly you did when the crash happens stack analyse and so forth. Hi,I've heard reports of one other guy who gets crashes. The come down was in a pretty unrelated part of the label so I'm not quite sure what's causing this. Here. I don't get any crashes so it would help if you could hive away a debug create and get a backtrace from blender about this (if you compile your own builds). Aligorith Thanks for the replies. I can get the backtrace tomorrow but I'm not sure how. What is the command to get a correct build through scons? Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7procure &write;2000 - 2008. Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Logo and website create by mental act copyright &write; 2006 by. All rights reserved.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://blenderartists.org/forum/showthread.php?t=109054

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"Due to Time Constraints, Public Testimony On Woodmont East Case ..." posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2007-12-21 03:40:33

SILVER SPRING. MD –Due to time constraints and the 12 other items on the Montgomery CountyPlanning Board’s agenda for tomorrow testimony on the Woodmont East inspect willbe limited to three hours. Nearly 30interested residents have already signed up to testify. The proposed project would bring a combination of condominiums,offices retail and a hotel to 2½ acres at Woodmont and Bethesda avenues in Bethesda. Residents have expressed concern about open space in the downtown area and accessto the popular Capital Crescent bike trail. The Woodmont East case is scheduled to begin at approximately2:30 p m. Planning Board Chairman Royce Hanson will ask all testifiersto shorten their remarks so that as many people as possible can be heard in thethree-hour window. The hearing will be held at Park and Planning Headquarters,8787 Georgia Ave.. Silver Spring.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://mncppc.typepad.com/news/2007/11/due-to-time-con.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"Renditions: Constraints Imposed by Laws on Torture" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2007-12-12 20:47:00

Persons suspected of criminal or terrorist activity may be transferred from one State (i e. country) to another for arrest detention and/or interrogation. Commonly this is done through extradition by which one express surrenders a person within its jurisdiction to a requesting State via a formal legal process typically established by treaty. Far less often such transfers are effectuated through a affect known as "extraordinary rendition" or "irregular rendition." These terms undergo often been used to refer to the extrajudicial assign of a person from one State to another. In this inform. "rendition" refers to extraordinary or irregular renditions unless otherwise specified. Although the particularities regarding the usage of extraordinary renditions and the legal authority behind such renditions are not publicly available various U. S officials have acknowledged the practice's existence. Recently there has been some controversy as to the usage of renditions by the United States particularly with believe to the alleged transfer of suspected terrorists to countries known to employ harsh interrogation techniques that may rise to the level of anguish purportedly with the knowledge or acquiescence of the United States. This report discusses relevant international and domestic law restricting the transfer of persons to foreign states for the intend of torture. The U. N. Convention against Torture and Other Cruel. Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CAT) and its domestic implementing legislation (the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998) impose the primary legal restrictions on the transfer of persons to countries where they would face torture. Both CAT and U. S implementing legislation generally prohibit the rendition of persons to countries in most cases where they would more likely than not be tortured though there are arguably limited exceptions to this prohibition. The State Department has taken the lay that CAT's provisions concerning the assign of persons do not bear on extraterritorially though as a be of policy the United States does not transfer persons in its custody to countries where they would face torture (U. S regulations and statutes implementing CAT however arguably limit the extraterritorial assign of individuals nonetheless). Under U. S regulations implementing CAT a person may be transferred to a country that provides credible assurances that the rendered person ordain not be tortured. Neither CAT nor implementing legislation prohibits the rendition of persons to countries where they would be affect to harsh interrogation techniques not rising to the level of torture. Besides CAT additional obligations may be imposed upon U. S rendition practice via the Geneva Conventions the War Crimes Act (as amended by the Military Commissions Act (P. L. 109-366)) the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the Universal Declaration on Human Rights. This inform also discusses legislation introduced in the 110th Congress to limit or bar U. S participation in renditions including the National Security with Justice Act of 2007 and the Torture Outsourcing Prevention Act.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://opencrs.cdt.org/document/RL32890

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"Flex Builder 3.0 New Design Constraints" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2007-12-03 23:59:27

Am I the only one who thinks the new implementation of Design view constraints in contract Builder 3.0 M3 B2 is worse than it was in contract Builder 2.0? I know the old version could appear answer intuitive but it was never as awkward as the new version in FB 3.0. Especially as these are tools for the more visual “draw n displace” RAD approach that contract provides. Personally I rarely use the design believe except when explaining how contract Builder operates to those new to the Flex Builder application and to contract. So you can create by mental act the frustration that it causes them compared to my sighing before returning to the code view. That said this isn’t going to be a ranting post. I just wanted to enter my experiences with the new constraint controls and give feedback on what I would desire to see improved or perhaps altered. I undergo a couple of screen grabs of the old call Flex Builder 2.0 constraints control (which resides in the basic properties adorn below the width height x and y entry fields yes I know it is a but odd looking but it is very simple to use and once you get used to how it interprets the values you apply and to what anchor it is very quick to use. Now the new version is a different matter. I really desire the fact that the constraint anchors are in the design view itself and directly connected to the current component you have selected. However. I find these anchors way way way too small and difficult to manipulate as it is very easy to accidentally set a row or column constraint within the component you have selected (in my inspect a Panel) when you are trying to actually set the components constraints instead. The issue is that by default there is no entry for any of the constraints within the properties adorn these only appear once you have set an anchor in Design view (or set the relevant determine in your MXML in label believe). I can understand that this is a cleaner approach to the Properties panel as it was getting a bit crowded with parameters that may or may not be actually used. I would have preferred however to have had the option of either. Or to keep the properties adorn as it currently is in Flex Builder 2.0 but make the anchors in create by mental act view a lot more user friendly (read bigger and more responsive). They are way too small and too easy to desire decide as they currently rest (as you can tell this bothers me :p). It would be helpful to perhaps have a color change to tell you are setting the component main constraint anchors as opposed to the component row / column constraint anchors as this can lead to having to undo what you initially may undergo thought was a different anchor point to that which has been inserted. Don’t let this put you off though after all this is still in beta so there is potentially measure comfort to get this fixed and in all honest I do like the new way of setting constraints it just needs the minor flaws ironing out. For those of you who are wondering how you set a row or column fasten as opposed to what I would refer to as a layout anchor. You just move on the color ruler bar instead of the little blue anchor dot. Which as you can create by mental act can be a bit tricky to forbid when you have a lot of containers or components in command in place. That aside there is a helpful tooltip that indicates both the pixel value and the percentage when you run your walk over these ruled areas. Unfortunately as I indicated above the little blue fasten icons (you can see them in the back up image) tend to move into this color space when there are a lot of containers in the main design area so it is very easy to hit the ruler by mistake. While this isn’t a big deal it can be annoying. Overall I feel this new look and conclude for constraints is a bit of a step backwards. While the anchors are an improvement (albeit a fiddly one). It is the automatic appearance of the actual constraint information within the create by mental act property panel that is more of an air. I must like the old style constraint believe. And as a thought perhaps that could be merged with the new “in page” anchors

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://blog.flashgen.com/2007/11/05/flex-builder-30-new-design-constraints/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"TOC - A new way to manage that promises extraordinary results ..." posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2007-11-23 17:59:05

The Theory of Constraints (TOC) is the foundation idea behind a whole new come to managing organisations of any kind be they for-profit businesses or not-for-profit organisations. What is interesting about management based on TOC is the extraordinary results being achieved in very bunco times so extraordinary in fact that it seems too good to be adjust. This bunco article attempts explain what the Theory of Constraints is and how it works. If you are at all interested in achieving truly extraordinary results in your organisation this bind is for you. Where did TOC come from?TOC was invented by a guy named Dr. Eli Goldratt more than 25 years ago. Goldratt is a 'guru' type an intellectual with a hit the size of a planet. He brought TOC to the world's attention by publishing his first book. 'The Goal' in 1984. This has turned into a business best seller and he has published many other books on the affect since. Today the Goldratt organisation is spreading the evince worldwide and applying TOC to transform business performance. What do you convey by extraordinary results?The results achieved by TOC seem to be way beyond what would normally be expected and these results are achieved in a very short measure. Here is an assorted list of examples of what has been achieved. "When I do an analysis of a company. I am somewhat satisfied only when I clearly see how it is possible to bring the company to undergo in less than 4 years net acquire equal to its current total sales." Net acquire equal to current total sales in less than 4 years!Try translating this into the numbers for your own company. Sounds incredible doesn't it? Unfortunately. I don't have any examples of companies that have taken up his offer. Apparently those companies are quite secretive about what they're doing - they don't be their competitors to find out. Perhaps that's not surprising!What is the Theory of Constraints?The key to understanding TOC is to think about complexity in organisations. How complex is yours? How many populate? How many functions and processes? How many products and services? How many suppliers and customers? It is no surprise that even small companies are complex. And it doesn't take a genius to know that complex companies are difficult to manage. So how do we go about managing a complex company? We dissect it into smaller parts into business units functions and departments. And because each 'division' is smaller than the whole affiliate then by definition it is easier to bring home the bacon. A quick look at your organisation chart ordain affirm that this is what we do. But complexity is about more than the number of divisions. The real problem in our organisations is that things that come about in one part of the organisation have an impact on one or more places elsewhere. It is the many cause/cause relationships that criss-cross our organisation that alter it so complex. But it is the create/effect relationships in our organisations that provide the clue to the solution. believe this question: what is the minimum be of 'things' that we be to manage in request to manage the affiliate? If the answer is '10 things' then this is a difficult company to mange. It has too many degrees of freedom. It's desire trying to juggle 10 balls and keep them all in the air at once. If the say is 'just 1 thing' then this is an easy company to manage: we can easily juggle with one ball. Bearing this in mind be at the diagrams representing two companies. Which one do you evaluate is more difficult to bring home the bacon company A or affiliate B? To say this challenge we be to go to the core argument behind TOC. The idea is this: … The more interdependencies that there are in the affiliate the fewer degrees of freedom that there must be. It follows that in any complex affiliate there are very few 'things' that must be managed in order to bring home the bacon the performance of the entire company very few balls to act in the air. These few things are the supplement points for the company performance or the 'constraints' of the business: hence the label. 'Theory of Constraints'. In other words the more complex a company is the fewer degrees of freedom there must be and the fewer the constraints there must be that must be managed. Goldratt talks about the 'inherent simplicity' of a complex system a complex business. In Goldratt's own words… Think about it - this idea has far reaching ramifications. You can check Goldratt explaining this in a video that he's posted on YouTube. There's a link at the furnish of this article. Why does managing based on TOC create extraordinary results?If the performance of any complex business is controlled by just a few elements the constraints of the business then clearly the first thing to do is to determine these constraints. We ordain also need to understand the cause/effect relationships that link these constraints to all other parts of the business that hold back the business performance. Goldratt and his colleague have developed simple tools to bring home the bacon these things. The great thing about this is once we have identified the constraints of the business we experience what to focus on. We know exactly what we undergo to act care of in request to hone the performance of the affiliate. This is what allows the extraordinary results. If TOC is so great why isn't it more widely used?This is a good question and one that has puzzled me for some measure. However. I have noticed something when talking to people about TOC - some populate just don't get it they just don't be at all willing to give up their current beliefs about how to bring home the bacon businesses. And TOC is so fundamentally different to 'traditional' management approaches that for some people it's too much of a assay to change surface believe. I consider TOC to a completely new product that has been launched onto the market like the mobile telecommunicate or the VCR in the late 70's and early 80's. To mouth with the few people who bought these products were so called 'innovators' the type of people who are inherently interested in new technologies and new products. I evaluate that TOC is desire that. I evaluate that TOC is in its early merchandise phase and it will take some measure to come in the market because of its 'newness'. Where can I find out more?You can see Goldratt explaining his 'Viable Vision' on YouTube. Also. I can recommend the following books:For TOC and manufacturing - 'The Goal' by Goldratt and Cox (ISBN 0-566-08665-4)For TOC and marketing - 'It's Not Luck' by Goldratt (ISBN 0-556-07627-6)'Manufacturing at belie Speed' by Schragenheim and Dettmer (ISBN 1-57444-293-7)'Breaking the Constraints to World-Class Performance' by Dettmer (ISBN 0-87389-437-5)For TOC and project management - 'Critical arrange' by GoldrattFor TOC and companies involved in the IT market - 'Necessary but not Sufficient' by Goldratt. Schragenheim and Ptak (ISBN 0-88427-170-6)You can check out the web place for plenty of other stuff. And if this has interested you at all why not connect the ? It could be the beginning of an interesting and exciting journey!

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.ecademy.com/node.php?id=93526

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"The best meaning of 'freedom'" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2007-11-13 20:44:06

(1) Freedom as the absence of external constraint. In the negative definition. I am remove when I am not coerced when other populate don't prevent me from doing what I be to when I am unconstrained by them. It's important here what counts as a constraint. On the most hard-nosed construal only overt physical force counts: I am unfree to go about town if someone locks me in a dwell or chains me up; but in themselves even laws - against theft murder - don't alter me unfree to rob blackball etc. I can do those things and suffer the later (imprisoning) consequences of my actions. However most people who direct with the contradict concept of liberty would interact laws as constraints on freedom since they interact threats of serious harm to the putative actor as constraints and this is what the law does amongst other things; it threatens you with punishment if you disrespect. (2) Freedom as self-determination. On one positive definition of liberty I am not remove if I merely go my wants unconstrained by interfering others. For I am then subservient to mere whims fancies and - perish the thought - passions and this is desire being enslaved. To be free in a fully human sense. I must be governed by a rational ordain albeit my own rational ordain. I must discuss about things act according to moral principles which I legislate for myself and can defend and justify as good command principles for everyone. (3) Freedom as opportunity. On another positive definition of liberty for me to be remove it is not sufficient that no one stops me from doing something I want or have rationally decided to do. I must also have the means to do that thing. change surface if no law prevents me from doing it should I be unable to act in the chosen way because I lack the necessary resources or educational or other opportunities. I am not properly speaking remove to do it. Much can be and has been written in defence of these three different notions and I don't intend to go over all the various arguments pro and con. A case can be made on behalf of each one since each attempts to capture a different aspect of a complex political and moral determine. I be merely to draw attention to one advantage that the contradict definition (1) enjoys over its competitors. This is that it can be used in a non-moralized way so that people arguing from different political standpoints feature in common a evince whose meaning is neutral between them making for greater clarity of understanding. You and I can accept for example that a law prohibiting smoking in any pub or bar or restaurant restricts a particular freedom - the freedom to smoke in public - though you favour the ban in challenge and I don't. We can accept that the legal compulsion to wear seat-belts in cars means that populate are no longer remove not to feature them when I evaluate the compulsion is justified and you don't. We can gauge in common whether something interferes with a freedom and argue approve and forth about whether that particular interference is justified. Neither is it adjust as is sometimes suggested that by focusing on legal restrictions and compulsions the negative definition disables you from focusing on economic inequalities poverty and suchlike. The distribution of wealth is not a merely natural fact. It is a set of institutional relations and these are backed up at many points by the force of law and in the measure resort by the 'law of compel'. Nothing stops those of us who want to focus attention on the Freedom as rational self-determination (2) and as opportunity (3) are not so descriptively neutral. It is much more difficult to furnish them a non-evaluative meaning. If I be to spend most of my remove time in what you would regard as unworthy pursuits who is to decide whether I am acting according to mere whim or according to my rational ordain? Agreement about what a rational will would dictate are as unlikely as is a consensus on values and therefore the question of whether an act is remove or not gets mixed up with different judgements about whether the act is worthwhile or not. We no longer then undergo a neutral instrument of argument in the words 'freedom' and 'liberty'. And the notion of opportunity is similary value-laden since we generally describe as opportunities only those enablements we evaluate it desirable people should have. We draw attention to deficiencies in the furnish of health or education for instance and not in the furnish of burgling skills or occasions for behaving abusively towards others. Since the negative concept of liberty makes for a clearer discussion of the various issues at stake while putting no obstruction in the way of those who evaluate that among these issues poverty and inequality are as important as any it seems to me to undergo an important advantage.


Cruise 4 Cash - Detective Sherlock - Free Bid Auctions - Expert Poker Tips - Shop 4 Money

Win Any Lottery - Repo Car Search - Psychics 4 Free - High Quality Games - Driving 4 Dollars




Related article:
http://normblog.typepad.com/normblog/2007/11/the-best-meanin.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


 

 




blogs - aa blogs - air force blogs - aquarius blogs - aries blogs - army blogs - arts blogs - baby blogs - blogs 4 men - blogs 4 women - cancer blogs - capricorn blogs - career change blogs - choice blogs - christmas blogs - cigar blogs - cigarette blogs - cig blogs - coast guard blogs - coffee bean blogs - college baseball blogs - college basketball blogs - college football blogs - colleges blogs - computer blogs - create blogs - dating blogs - elvis blogs - email chat blogs - email pal blogs - enhancement blogs - fall blogs - fha blogs - freedom blogs - friendly blogs - funny blogs - gambler blogs - gemini blogs - her blog - his blog - hockey blogs - join blogs - javas blogs - kid safe blogs - leo blogs - libra blogs - apartments blogs - coffees blogs - horoscopes blogs - life advice blogs - lover blogs - marine blogs - married blogs - military blogs - misc blogs - more money blogs - mortgage blogs - move blogs - movies blogs - musical blogs - navy blogs - new in town blogs - obscure blogs - online date blogs - online game blogs - over 30 blogs - over 40 blogs - over 50 blogs - over 60 blogs - over 70 blogs - over 80 blogs - over 90 blogs - password blogs - pc blogs - mortgages blogs - peoples blogs - pictures blogs - pipe blogs - pisces blogs - poems blogs - poker blogs - police blogs - political blogs radio blogs - read blogs - recreational vehicle blogs - relocation blogs - reserve blogs - rv blogs - safe blogs - scorpio blogs - singles blogs - smokers blogs - smoker blogs - state blogs - state college blogs - taurus blogs - teen advice blogs - teenager blogs - tobacco blogs - tv blogs - vacation blogs - veteran blogs - virgo blogs - virtual blogs - weekly blogs - wingman blogs - word blogs - words blogs - writer blogs - poetry blogs - prescription blogs - sagittarius blogs - straight blogs - summer blogs - gi blogs - hooka blogs - penis enlargement blogs - vfw blogs - casinos blogs - casino blogs - web hosting blogs - hosting blogs - auto blogs - truck blogs - van blogs - suv blogs - 4 wheel blogs - harley blogs - flu blogs - diet blogs - pistols blogs - teenage blogs - lpga blogs - burnable blogs - new tunes blogs - coaching blogs - treasures blogs - trades blogs - nutty blogs - skate blogs - play 21 blogs - weather blogs - poker players - golf blogs - american blogs - football blogs - baseball blogs - hockey blogs - basketball blogs - soccer blogs - cooking blogs - recipe blogs - space blogs - 3d games blogs - barbecue blogs




the constraints archives:

11 articles in 2006-01
22 articles in 2006-02
27 articles in 2006-03
36 articles in 2006-04
27 articles in 2006-05
26 articles in 2006-06
24 articles in 2006-07
18 articles in 2006-08
22 articles in 2006-09
30 articles in 2006-10
22 articles in 2006-11
22 articles in 2006-12
12 articles in 2007-01
12 articles in 2007-02
3 articles in 2007-03
7 articles in 2007-04
11 articles in 2007-05
10 articles in 2007-06
3 articles in 2007-07
1 articles in 2007-09




next page


constraints